|
it would make sense that if you were the producer you would need papers to prove legality.
But if you are simply stepping in as a middle man and advertising another site using ITS content you wouldn't necessarily have access to all those documents.
but what i find distressing is that the DOJ is looking to these 'secondary producers' to hold the papers as well. secondary producers being defined as someone "who inserts on a computer site or service a digital image of, or otherwise manages the sexually explicit content of a computer site or service that contains a visual depiction"
this would imply that if you host media of anytype, even if provided to you from another source, that you would be responsible.
BUMPING for more input.
|