Quote:
Originally Posted by SykkBoy2
Yeah, if I were her, I'd have been doing the same thing...though I'd likely have hired a more competent attorney...
|
Believe me - last thing you want to be bothering about is the quality of the other sides legal team
When they either screw up or make an error in serving paperwork in the correct jurisdiction - they will be back and getting the technicality in corrected and firming up their strategy. Had exactly the same kinda problem on stuff we are petitioning for, but it's no biggie - the papers were changed and the case is proceeding tho may continue for another year yet - no hurry.
Totally guessing here... but suspect her lawyers will be advising her they will get their act together and that she continue with the action - a jurisdictional problem is not really strong enough to deter anyone.
This kinda stuff is like a roller-coaster ride, - one day you will be on an upper, the next day is total crap - same during court hearing times.
Seriously... would be more inclined to address the core issue and look to preparing whatever valid elements of a defense for that. Know nothing about the background other than the CNN article, - but from that, Ms Williams has valid grounds for a case. Sure, the damage element is high - it's just the starting off talking point and prob means not a lot.