Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook
Saddam, as ruthless as he was, provided stability in Iraq. He didn?t put up with any bullshit and his country was ?free? of terrorists. Sure he was a dick, sure he was dangerous ? but not the United States nor the civilized world or anyone immediately outside of his region.  |
do you have any actually facts to proof you are so so right on this ?
- problem with your thinkin
- will be explained
all your thinkin is based on speculation .. thats a problem .. think about it .. yes you speculate that he was not a problem .. yes you speculate that he had no intentions in our direction . . but how do YOU know that ? cant imagine you have em on speed dial and that he was actually informing you about every move he was going to make
two words : terror funding
thats the problem . he does not like the US . he has lots of money . what he be doing with his dollars ?
we dont know .. have no idea .. is he makin large donations to certain organisations without our knowledge ? we dont know . can we stop him .. yes we can and we did
crazy people in charge of countries with lots of monies is NOT a safe situation and SHOULD BE seen as a threat
for that reason Iran is not that much of a problem .. them bitches are broke . .well as good as . .
