Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear
well thats obvious , but he/she prob feels the need to be anon.. i cant really blame them for that if the info is true.. if said legal material stated they were not to disclose it they could be legally liable and not able to reproduce it..
That being said this kind of accusation is easily squashed.. as i see no reason for the webmasters affected not to sterp forward if they did nothing wrong, they dont need to post their info to us.. just tell us their story in so many words ..
|
Yes I understand the fake nick IF it is true, but posting 1 post and then pissing off and not posting proof smells a bit fishy to me
