Quote:
Originally Posted by StickyGreen
Dude, look at the original photo in my first post. It is a side-by-side comparison of a NIST photo (which shows all the structural damage) and a photo taken by an independent photographer (which shows the same part of the building with no structural damage). Hello?
|
i was just asking what you were talking about. thats all. trying to argue that its all a conspiracy is absurd... but we all have to amuse ourselves with something.
all you have is two pics. the timeline of events isn't a matter of question 1) first building was hit... debris flew everywhere - 2) second building was hit, debris flew everywhere 3) first building collapsed showering the area with more substantial debris... 4) the second collapsed doing more of the same. the pic with more damage could have been taken after the first or second building collapsed (as all the dust on the atrium would suggest) but god forbid... don't ask any logical questions first.
a bunch of interweb lunatics have uncovered another important flaw in the massive conspiracy that involved countless 10's of 1000's of people because seriously.. what government official planning a conspiracy like this in broad daylight, in a city of 10,000,000 people would have really thought anyone would take some pics?