1) you have already proven yourself on multiple occasions to not be the sharpest knife in the drawer - so attempting to explain anything to is futile regardless.
2) you have already proven yourself to be prone to believing in conspiracy theories
3) you have already started threads under the fake premise of "just curious", "just asking questions" when you already had an agenda and a very specific view point on the matter (see your 9/11 conspiracy BS)
4) you don't have to be a genius to see the obvious problems with the shadows inside the ring and underneath the object and on the outside of the ring, opposite the shadows.
5) people are saying "its fake" because in most cases their brains pick up on these details and inconsistencies, setting off alarms even though they might not be able to effectively articulate why their first thought was that its fake.
if you dont know enough about images, photoshop and photography to see it, then there is no reason in attempting to point it out to you.
there is a deep, very dark shadow inside the ring showing the sunlight hitting it from the upper right towards the lower left. however that same shadow is not seen on the outside of the ring under the opposing "wing" in the side that would also be in the shade.
you can't simultaneously have a light source or reflected light underneath that perfectly and evenly lights the entire underneath of the object and have it have ZERO effect inside the ring or directly under/around it where very dark shadows are.
its simple... some guy created this model in Maya or 3D Studio Max and couldn't effectively match the lighting in the 3d render to that of the picture.... but he knew it didn't matter because as usual, idiots made up their minds what they want to believe BEFORE they see the pics anyway.
