View Single Post
Old 01-09-2003, 10:04 PM  
MuleScrote
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,601
Well fiveyes...that's the beauty of the internet. At any given time you can find that will support or disagree with anything under the sun. I have done enough research to understand that chelation is loosely supported by the FDA. They will not give full support until the completion of a large-scale research project that the government has invested $30M dollars in that starts in March.

Your quack page was published in 2000 and the FDA currently states that no properly controlled research has been performed. The fact of the matter is that Ronnie's vascular disease is too far progressed for surgery. As it stands now, he is at high risk of stroke if his blood pressure rises too high.

Furthermore, if you look at many of the "research" that has been performed, they have consisted of giving subjects one or two treatments per week. Now I don't know what advancements, if any, have been made to these chemicals since 2000. But Ronnie will be staying at the clinic for 30 days straight receiving a 3 hr treatment every single day. After that, he will have 2 or 3 per week until treatment is completed.

I'm not gonna scrap this because the field may be split on this one. Surgery is not an option, and patients in his condition have shown excellent response to the chelation treatments. As I said in an earlier post, Ronnie's dad died due to complications following the surgical procedure to fix this same disease (which can follow genetic lines). Maybe the surgeons are the quacks? Nothing shows 100% success but the decision here was very easy for us all to make.

Thank you,
MS
__________________
ICQ 78681003
MuleScrote is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote