View Single Post
Old 04-30-2007, 12:19 PM  
SmokeyTheBear
►SouthOfHeaven
 
SmokeyTheBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer
Posts: 28,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays View Post
no one said the steel "melted" in the WTC.

tell that to the molton globs of steel at the base of wtc

Lots of people have said the steel melted. i think what you mean to say is nobody said the building collapsed because of melted steel" although thats not really a very valid statement either.. probably a more vaid statement would be.. "By most sane accounts, the fires caused the beams to weaken , not melt"

I wasn't there and you prob werent either but i know there were several photos and accounts of "molton beams", were talking about a whole new "realm" of heat to turn steel "molton"

but like i said above. why look into the wierd explanations.. if the planes didnt collapse the buildings , whats the only other thing that could ? bombs. so if bombs were planted in wtc someone would have had to plan on collapsing the buildings with bombs at the exact floors and timing that planes just happen to crash into it.. thats beyond silly.
__________________
hatisblack at yahoo.com
SmokeyTheBear is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote