View Single Post
Old 04-30-2007, 08:18 AM  
Phoenix
BACON BACON BACON
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Poems everybody, the laddie fancies himself a poet
Posts: 35,472
Quote:
Originally Posted by XVNRacer View Post
The steel in the World Trade Center acted like an enormous heat sink. Any heat that was applied to a given area of the steel frame was soaked up by the immense mass of steel in the entire structure. There wasn't enough heat to warm up the steel frame more than a few degrees overall. Infrared analysis of the many video tapes of the fires taken before the collapse give a pretty good indication of how much heat the structure was subjected to, where, and for how long. The data are consistent with what you'd get from burning jet fuel (which is basically kerosene, much less volatile and cooler burning than ordinary gasoline) and the burning contents of the building. No way the fires could have heated up the steel to anything like what would have been necessary to cause a catastrophic failure of the whole building.

RACER

logic doesnt sit well with this crowd

they like to believe whatever cnn tells them
__________________
Skype Phoenixskype1
Telegram PhoenixBrad
https://quantads.io
Phoenix is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote