GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - 9/11 Conspiracy Theory Up In Smoke? San Fran Crash Melts Steel

SmokeyTheBear · 04-29-2007, 10:34 PM

its hard to compare apples to oranges. in 9/11 most of the fuel was burned up in the crash being high speed and a large fireball , a tanker full of fuel would likely burn slower and hotter.. if the tanker was driving at 600 miles per hour then maybe..

but hey i'm not a structural engineer.

For the record i think its prob more likely they used shitty steel and to admit that would make america look bad.

Although there are tons of very strange "coincidences" with wtc 1&2 i think its rather ridiculous to think someone planned on bombing at in precise timing of planes crashing into it..

04-29-2007, 10:34 PM
SmokeyTheBear ►SouthOfHeaven Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer Posts: 28,609	its hard to compare apples to oranges. in 9/11 most of the fuel was burned up in the crash being high speed and a large fireball , a tanker full of fuel would likely burn slower and hotter.. if the tanker was driving at 600 miles per hour then maybe.. but hey i'm not a structural engineer. For the record i think its prob more likely they used shitty steel and to admit that would make america look bad. Although there are tons of very strange "coincidences" with wtc 1&2 i think its rather ridiculous to think someone planned on bombing at in precise timing of planes crashing into it.. __________________ hatisblack at yahoo.com