GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - is 3d rendered content excemted on childporn law?

BoyAlley · 04-26-2007, 04:34 PM

If it's 100% computer generated imagery it's not CP and it's obviously not covered by 2257 either.

HOWEVER!

Just because it's not CP, because it doesn't depict an actual real-life child, it may still be OBSCENE!!!!!!!!!!

Let's not forget the charges recently filed against the Red Rose Story Archive, which contained only WRITTEN WORD descriptions of fictitious minors engaged in sexual context.

Certainly if the government's position is that written word descriptions of minors in sexual cicrumstance is obsencene, it would certainly be logical to say that they'd view generated imagery as being the same.

04-26-2007, 04:34 PM
BoyAlley So Fucking Gay Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 19,714	If it's 100% computer generated imagery it's not CP and it's obviously not covered by 2257 either. HOWEVER! Just because it's not CP, because it doesn't depict an actual real-life child, it may still be OBSCENE!!!!!!!!!! Let's not forget the charges recently filed against the Red Rose Story Archive, which contained only WRITTEN WORD descriptions of fictitious minors engaged in sexual context. Certainly if the government's position is that written word descriptions of minors in sexual cicrumstance is obsencene, it would certainly be logical to say that they'd view generated imagery as being the same.