Originally Posted by spanky part 2

Then again when they wrote that stuff, they were fighting off native americans, had to hunt for their food, and didn't have broke ass pookie and his 15 year old buddies being men by toting a semi automatic.

Trying to compare then to now is just plain stupid.

I always thought that the right to bear arms doesn't mean you get a handgun or semi automatic. Why not ban everything but bolt action rifles? If you need anything other than that to hunt, then you shouldn't be hunting. Any other type of gun is just for causing trouble.

I have a friend who thinks the right to bear arms means he can have a flame thrower and a bazooka. where does it end?