View Single Post
Old 04-19-2007, 02:18 PM  
Phil21
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: ICQ: 25285313
Posts: 993
sometimes you simply get unlucky, unfortunately. Many more failures however, and I'd start to take a look at your environment. Your failure rate definitely falls outside of the curve a tad

In a hosting operation, we have thousands of Seagate drives in production. We also have thousands of Maxtor drives previously deployed in production before our wholesale switch to Seagate. Maxtor has a somewhat higher historical failure rate than our Seagate drives in production - but in the end it's pretty close. The factor in choosing Seagate (before the maxtor was bought) was due to both the 5 year warranty vs. 1 year, and the fact that Seagate tended to be on the upper end of the performance and technology curve.

Seagate has been great in our book, lower than "average" failure rate, and RMA procedures that are simple to do bulk returns with. Hard drives should always be treated as something that is about to fail - as that is exactly what they are.

I also strongly urge keeping a spare disk around for your array A drive is much more likely to fail during the rebuild process, as that is when they are the most stressed. When you get into 15+ disk arrays, you start to see interesting mathematical probability issues - such as uncorrectable error rate per million sector reads. Doing the math someday can be a pretty wide eye opener.

Ah well, good luck!
__________________
Quality affordable hosting.
Phil21 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote