|
As much as I hate to admit it… Splum actually has somewhat of a point here. Let’s assume that the homosexual couple involved each come from homes where they are an only child. By choosing not to breed with the opposite sex, they cannot pass along their genes. As such, their genetic line comes to an end.
In cases of consensual incest (I say consensual because though rare, it is what would be required in this scope of the discussion), it would take several generations of constant incest conceptions to cause any real potential damage to the genetic lineage. So in this case, the incestuous relationship leads to future generations of children, thus their genetic line continues.
Personally I see nothing wrong with consensual incest as a whole… an incestuous conception is marginally (almost negligible) more dangerous than a normal conception. I don’t see anything wrong with homosexuality either.
|