04-08-2007, 10:01 AM
|
|
|
So Fucking Banned
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In a house.
Posts: 9,465
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scootermuze
§ 2256. Definitions for chapter
(8) (B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; ....
(11) the term “indistinguishable” used with respect to a depiction, means virtually indistinguishable, in that the depiction is such that an ordinary person viewing the depiction would conclude that the depiction is of an actual minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct.
-----------------------------
This being the case, it could be considered cp if the powers that be decided to make it such.. I'd say a rather large gray area in this particular situation..
|
Good try, but don't quit your day job to be a lawyer - you quoted the stuff without context:
Quote:
(8) “child pornography” means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where—
(A) the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(B) such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
(C) such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct.
|
The entirety of section 8B and C is to cover machine generated / photochop style porn.
Good try thought, but you need to work on those critical reading skills. |
|
|