View Single Post
Old 04-06-2007, 09:58 PM  
notabook
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Not a Library!
Posts: 9,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splum View Post
Lol ok so consent isnt really the basis its just one guideline, you dont see where this is going?
Consent is the primary guideline and it should always be. But you can't have it being an end-all-be-all thing. If a chick and I consented to cut off each others arms while fucking, we couldn't do that lawfully because of harmful intent. The fucking, sure. Sliced off limbs, nada. Two gays consenting to sex is lawful because there is no harmful intent. Both people (or multiple people if you are into that sorta thing) can consent to have sex, and since there is no harmful intent there is no logical reason to deny them. At this point you can only really fall back onto a crutch of religious morality since there is no logical reason to prevent two consenting adults, regardless of sexual orientation, from having sex.
__________________
notabook is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote