04-06-2007, 07:00 PM
|
|
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 6,195
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo
I didn't say it was the same as having red hair or type O blood. I said those things were uncommon, but are close to the same percentage of people who are homosexual. You stated that homosexuality was uncommon, I'm saying that they are as common as the things I listed.
|
Wait did you just say homosexuality is as common as those other uncommon things? 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo
You say it's nurture not nature, yet you can't find any natural coorelation in society. Homosexuals are rich, poor, black, white, have good parents, bad parents, and on and on. They've been around since before Christ. So if you believe homosexuality is nurture not nature, please tell us what causes it since no one on this planet has found any coorelation in society that causes it on a grand scale.
|
I told you this above pay attention but here it is again: I never said it was nurture please stop trying to put words into my mouth to fit your argument.
Its NOT nurture, while genetics may have some slight disposition to be more feminine, etc the cause of Homosexuality is CHOICE. There are no homosexual infants. |
|
|