Quote:
Originally Posted by Probono
I still does matter for those covered by it until the judge dissolves the agreement wit DOJ not to inspect those on the agreement.
|
That's true in principle, but when 4472 passed, it made pretty much everything in the Denver injunction moot. The principal argument on the secondary producer issue was that it was decided (in favor of secondary producers) in Sundance vs Reno, and 4472 was passed to essentially "undo" Sundance vs Reno.
So even if you are an FSC member, according to our attorney, you have not had protection against inspections for secondary records since 4472 passed.
Why no one has paid any attention to this until now is totally beyond me... I and quite a few others have been talking about it for months.