GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

04-05-2007, 11:14 AM

I'm seeing the same panic as I did the first time around, and a lot of people on other boards thinking that there is no appeal possible for the secondary group. Now correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like an appeal for secondary producers is still possible according to #4. This is taken from http://avnonline.com/index_cache.php...tent_ID=286357.

Generally left for trial are (1) Internet chat rooms; (2) Web sites not under control of the record-keeper; (3) The regulations' facial requirements producers must comply with 2005 amended regulations with respect to pre-2005 depictions; and, as noted above (4) the validity of the secondary producer record-keeping, etc., requirements under the Adam Walsh Act.

I may be wrong, but I think we may see this tired up a bit longer in the courts. Regardless, now is the time to get all your ducks in a row.

The sky isn't falling...there are just some clouds forming.

04-05-2007, 11:14 AM
shermo Guest Posts: n/a	2257 and Secondary Producers I'm seeing the same panic as I did the first time around, and a lot of people on other boards thinking that there is no appeal possible for the secondary group. Now correct me if I'm wrong, but it looks like an appeal for secondary producers is still possible according to #4. This is taken from http://avnonline.com/index_cache.php...tent_ID=286357. Generally left for trial are (1) Internet chat rooms; (2) Web sites not under control of the record-keeper; (3) The regulations' facial requirements producers must comply with 2005 amended regulations with respect to pre-2005 depictions; and, as noted above (4) the validity of the secondary producer record-keeping, etc., requirements under the Adam Walsh Act. I may be wrong, but I think we may see this tired up a bit longer in the courts. Regardless, now is the time to get all your ducks in a row. The sky isn't falling...there are just some clouds forming.