View Single Post
Old 04-05-2007, 11:00 AM  
JMM
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,755
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoyAlley View Post

They can't be unless they willingly take on that responsibility, and although an attorney would need to verify this as I'm not 100% sure, the way I read it is that the listed Custodian Of Record indeed takes on that burden.
In a real word 2257 case, specifically GGW, 4 people were charged and sentenced on 2257 violations. Only one of the 4 was the custodian of records. All 4 were company officers. It is not clear if the custodian was charged AS custodian, or as an officer of the company.
JMM is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote