View Single Post
Old 04-04-2007, 10:31 AM  
FightThisPatent
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPeRMiNaToR View Post
Exactly. but what about AFFILIATES... paysite owners sound have been compliant since day 1 but affiliates are the ones that are going to get the short end of the stick here...

excellent point.. especially the practice of affiliates who receive images from sponsors to use on their own sites.

it seems like FHG are safer for affiliates since the images are hosted with the sponsor who has (supposedly) all the docs.

Even taking screenshots of a paysite to put on an affiliate site creates some 2257 issues....

I think alot of sponsors have a good handle on 2257, in having an attorney who understands 2257, as well as receiving the 2257 docs from their content suppliers or from shooting for themselves.

I think 2257 is another issue that will illuminate the squeezing of the affiliates to a smaller group (ie whales), that have the relationships to sponsors that could get the docs and continue their affiliate marketing promotions.



Fight the downsizing!
__________________

http://www.t3report.com
(where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com
| ICQ 52741957
FightThisPatent is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote