View Single Post
Old 04-03-2007, 09:37 AM  
jact
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakville, Canada
Posts: 9,134
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorB View Post
"The court, on its own, noted that the Adam Walsh Act had amended the statute, and therefore Sundance had been effectively overruled by Congress. The court allowed FSC until April 16th to show why the law, as amended, is unconstitutional; and until the end of April for the government to reply.

Therefore, any time after May 1, 2007, the court may rule that secondary producers are required to have copies of the records, have them indexed, and be subject to inspections. "

This is stupid. Ok which non-American "secondary prodcuers" here are going to comply wiht this? Anyone...anyone.....? So what is the point?

Instead of checking 1000 websites that have the SAME content on it isn't it better just to check the records vis-a-vis the orignal prodcuer who actually made the content? If I have a scene from a movie on my website and the producers that actually made the film have all the orginal documents why should I have to have them? Does a video store that rents and sells porn DVDs have to have a copy of the 2257 info? No they don't. Same damned thing.
It's the same reason they audit people under the poverty line, to ensure that people are complying or at least making best efforts to do so.
__________________
Free agent
jact is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote