Quote:
Originally Posted by Splum
|
"On the other hand, Enterprisers and Liberals ha whose political opinions mix no better than oil and water ha have a surprising amount of common ground both economically and educationally. These groups are the wealthiest and best educated in the typology. Roughly four-in-ten Enterprisers and Liberals (41% each) have annual household incomes of at least $75,000; only the Upbeats (39%) have about as many people in that income category. "
Interesting huh?
I also found this interesting... must explain your stance:
"Indeed, when it comes to explaining partisanship, income is not nearly as powerful a factor as the familiar stereotype would suggest. To find out its relative influence, Pew conducted a multiple regression analysis of survey data it has collected on party identification since January of 2004. This is a statistical technique that measures the relative impact of each of a set of factors on a phenomenon of interest.
The analysis (see table) shows that of six demographic traits often linked to partisanship, race is the most influential driver of party identification, and frequency of church attendance is the second most important. Income, union membership and gender are of roughly equal importance, and education is least important."
Anyway, continue on dimwit... until you give me anything of substance, I'll just keep thinking of you in the same way that everyone else is thinking of the blonde in that video.
