Quote:
Originally Posted by dig420
damn, one response and you start kissing ass?
|
Quite the opposite...
Lars (or a proxy posting on his behalf, as I suspect), implied that the very relevent points I made in my first post in this thread were somehow influenced by some unidentified former-industry person he dislikes and believes is a friend of mine.
As I tried to indicate, that is patently false.
I still stand my opinion which I advanced in my first post in this thread:
Quote:
AFF seems to be paying for ad space or providing affiliate accounts to numerous sites that illegally rip off and repost adult content, depriving the content owners of profits from their content, and allowing pirate sites to flourish.
These sites oversaturate the web with so-called free porn, when in fact AFF ad/affiliate sales seem to be their main source of income. In esscence it appears that Lars/AFF is profiteering from sites that steal/pirated content by underwriting their efforts through their ad/affiliate program.
|
So far all Lars has offered up in response is smoke and mirrors - hence my who is the mystery person (?) post.
The more pertinent issue is how Lars and AFF can be a member in good standing within the adult industry, when by the proof presented thus far, he/AFF rewards and encourages sites that steal content from exclusive content producers, only for his own benefit, and to the detriment of the specific sites affected, and the industry at large.
ADG Webmaster