Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear
you forgot to mention the "facts" , the FACTS were he worked at the facility that much of the wtc rubble was placed, thats common FACT , no mystery there, FACT is they also use this facility for material for road repairs.. he said "possibly " about the material containing bone fragments as it would be impossible for him to know that unless he saw bone fragments, one would rationally presume if you had wtc rubble it prob has human remains as 40% of the victims were never found, if you noticed trucks using that rubble to pave roads you might be concerned and i think we should be.
why would yahoo need to "incite" us ? so were um mad at ? your theory makes no sense..
if it was made up the city would simply say " no wtc rubble was there , or we never used any rubble for paving " end of story..
|
hate to break it to you but "news" is nothing more than a contest to push peoples buttons these days. its entertainment.
as i said,... the story says nothing except that ONE construction worker filed a court affidavit. thats all. there are no facts. there is no other side of the story.
its just a simple story written to inflame opinions and touch emotional hot buttons for page views, ratings and ad sales. nothing else.
don't play ignorant and pretend that just because the city didn't comment at the time of the article means that they had any info to make a comment or even had heard about it at all when reporters asked them.
FACT - a construction guy filed an affidavit in court making a claim
FACT - thats it. there is no other side to the story.
FACT - one side of a story is shitty reporting
FACT - reacting to one side of a story is irrational