Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
i hate to be the one to point out the obvious again... but the entire remains of the building was immediately removed, metal salvaged and processed etc. its quite a stretch to suggest that "human remains" are being used to pave roads when basically the entire article, written to incite people like you guys was based on an affidavit filed by a construction worker... and used language like "possibly" ... not a statement of fact. but hey.... its GFY, who needs facts to get upset and emotional anyway?
|
you forgot to mention the "facts" , the FACTS were he worked at the facility that much of the wtc rubble was placed, thats common FACT , no mystery there, FACT is they also use this facility for material for road repairs.. he said "possibly " about the material containing bone fragments as it would be impossible for him to know that unless he saw bone fragments, one would rationally presume if you had wtc rubble it prob has human remains as 40% of the victims were never found, if you noticed trucks using that rubble to pave roads you might be concerned and i think we should be.
why would yahoo need to "incite" us ? so were um mad at ? your theory makes no sense..
if it was made up the city would simply say " no wtc rubble was there , or we never used any rubble for paving " end of story..