Quote:
Originally Posted by baddog
So, you are saying that they should sift thru all the rubble, and then conduct DNA tests on every fragment found to identify the person?
|
me ? no .. i think any material that could possibly contain remains should be given a proper burial even if its justa big field that is turned into a park or something. doesn't have to be at ground zero. i see no reason to sift rhu the rubble. if your family member was at wtc and is missing , they are likely dead, having bone fragments doesnt seem like the goal of victims, im sure there are some who want something but i think they would be satisfied knowing that they are somehwere not in a pothole
as far as ground zero, in terms of cost and the war , it would be piddly amount to preserve it as a memorial, but im not toally against building on it.. seeing as how they are still finding body parts i think they havent done a good enough job yet of finding the victims.. we do far bigger projects all the time. , dig up whats left . bury it in a field , make it a park preserve it forever. i dont see the harm in that . do we really need to use wtc rubble to fill porholes ? cmon now..