View Single Post
Old 03-21-2007, 11:23 PM  
DonkeyPunchProductions
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: back in la
Posts: 188
Quote:
Originally Posted by chadknowslaw View Post
It is amazing how many different views can come from one small topic!

2257 has not been litigated, so no judge has interpreted the law, leaving lawyers and pseudo-lawyers to guess how the law may or may not be interpreted!

Here is one section that pertains to this topic:

§ 75.2 Maintenance of records.

(a) Any producer of any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, digitally- or computer-manipulated image, digital image, picture, or other matter ....that contains one or more visual depictions of an actual human being engaged in actual sexually explicit conduct made after July 3, 1995 shall, for each performer portrayed in such visual depiction, create and maintain records containing the following:

(1) The legal name and date of birth of each performer, obtained by the producer's examination of a picture identification card. For any performer portrayed in such a depiction made after July 3, 1995, the records shall also include a legible copy of the identification document examined and, if that document does not contain a recent and recognizable picture of the performer, a legible copy of a picture identification card.





What hangs people up, lawyers and well-intentioned GFY'ers, are the words "A" and "THE" when referring to a photo ID. Some want to interpret this SO LITERALLY that they believe it means there must be ONE, and ONLY ONE, picture identification card.

Believing that one and only one ID may be kept in 2257 records is nonsense. The regulation section I included above even refers to a second form of ID if the first does not have a recent picture.

One government issued ID is required. Getting 2 is just covering your ass and there is nothing wrong with keeping copies of 2 ID's in your records. I am so 150% certain that I am right on this that I make this guarantee--

I will provide full legal defense, or pay the attorney of your choice, for anyone who is indicted solely for having 2 model ID's in their records instead of 1.
I am that sure it will never happen.



The easiest way to get a fake ID to drink in a bar is to get an older brother or sister's ID. Bouncers know this, so when they have someone that looks young a good bouncer will ask for another form of ID--like a credit card. The older sibling might give up the driver's license for a night but rarely would give Junior a second ID or credit card to boot. The easiest way to get a fake ID to make some money getting naked is to get an older sibling's ID. If you deal with young models, demand to see at least 2 forms of ID. You will not get in trouble for asking for 2 forms of ID. You will get in trouble for shooting an underage model. I would think producers are at least as smart as the guys holding the door at nightclubs.
He is right. Always best to know the law and read the statutes and consult an attorney similar the above quoted member of the bar. If you want to be extra careful you can also get an id scanner similar to ones bars use to insure the authenticity of the id card presented. However such will not preclude a younger sister using an older sister’s id. Therefore, two id’s are desirable.

Been studying this for some time, the reason I waited over a year between having several opportunities to shoot models and now. No child will ever be shot by my company. I genuinely take this dead seriously.

My first couple posts were juvenile yet were aimed at getting real answers. I thought you all were idiots, and when in Rome, well. I was wrong. From there I studied the statutes and codes and have an understanding rivaling any current practicing attorney. I wonder how many other industry producers take such precautions. probably none.
__________________

donkey, donkey
www.velvetdonkey.com
DonkeyPunchProductions is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote