Quote:
Originally Posted by chadknowslaw
It is amazing how many different views can come from one small topic!
2257 has not been litigated, so no judge has interpreted the law, leaving lawyers and pseudo-lawyers to guess how the law may or may not be interpreted!
|
This is a very good point - although I should hope lawyers are making an
argument as to what the interpretation
should be, as opposed to
guessing what it
might be.... right?
Otherwise, what do we pay you guys for?
I'm kidding, of course - but I do hope that it's not the case that 'my guess is as good as yours' with regards to existing statutory definitions, and how such might be applied to the same terms within the context of 2257 and the related CFRs.
- Q.