|
case and point was the guy who had his domain ganked with no warning over questionable aged pics that turned out to be 2257 compliant content.. instead of admitting " we used our personal judgement " etc etc they chose to use the " we got a dmca complaint " etc when we both know google itself has questionable pics and nobody ganks their domain, if i complained about a pic on google , do you really think if directnic was the registrar they would gank gfy with no warning until gfy proved the age of the girl in the picture ? i think not
__________________
hatisblack at yahoo.com
|