Quote:
Originally Posted by KrisKross
Understandable. But if you came across a site filled with content branded with other companies' watermarks (Bangbros, Juggcash, Nasty Dollars, etc), would you give the site the benefit of the doubt and process for them? Or would you request at least some sort of proof of ownership?
I'm not saying this is the case for the aforementioned site, as I've yet to see it's members area. I'm asking about your policy in general.
|
ccbill has no idea if the content was given to the site in question unless it is challenged by DMCA. they are not affiliates and program owners like we are. with as much content as is given out there is no possible way for them to keep up with it. they do actively shut people off if dmca'd by the copyright holders. we are on top of everything way more than them and we know an infringer immediately whereas in their case, alot of times because of the way we all work together, we need to inform them, such as in this case. i'd be willing to bet that he won't be processing with ccbill much longer. one person fiing a dmca with them should take care of him.