Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
so... lets get this straight. it make perfect sense to you when you say you are fighting for what you believe in (i.e. framing your arguments as just and righteous) and at the same time characterizing his arguments as weak and wrong.
if your and his arguments are polar opposites and there is no neutral position, that means you are actually arguing that he agrees with you.
thats not only WEAK ... but a little weird.
|
ill try not to insult your comprehension ability here.
my statements...bushco is evil and not doing anything but hurting the american public...that is my premise.
his premise is that im naive for not realizing there is nothing that can be done against them.
our arguments are not polar opposites at all...he is agreeing with me but laughing and saying to just go with it.
it is like the warriors choice..die fast or die slow?