Quote:
Originally Posted by MrPinks
Doesn't that only apply to hardcore content?
|
It depends on what the DoJ definition of a "set" is. By the definition of most of the First Amendment attorneys who have spoken publicly, if there is actually sexually explicit conduct (touching genitals, touching another person if both are naked), then 2257 compliance is required. If a male is erect, it is probably subject to 2257. If a subset of pics used in a gallery come from a larger set containing sexually explicit content, even if the subset pics themselves are clothed, some attorneys say that they are still subject to 2257 based on the way the regs are written.