Originally Posted by Narfle

Out of curiousity, can you defend that statement or is it just your random unfounded opinion?

I dont mean defend it in a fist fight, i mean you should form a logical argument proving your statement correct.

Im just curious really, because I personally belive you are wrong. Violence is simply a tool (dont confuse it with 'rage') and as a tool it has pros and cons.

And therefore, given the correct situation violence would be the first resort of the intellectual. Its only logical.

But ofcource its not a catchy slogan that you can spout and if people disagree you say it again louder

Were you raised by bumper stickers by any chance?