Quote:
Originally Posted by lyn1
I read a scientific paper in Oz where the greenies wanted cattle farming in Australia banned and more agriculture. The scientists for the cattle union released a paper with some of the points in interracialtoons without the emotion and doomsday stuff.
|
Wouldn't that report be just a bit biased since it was done by the cattle union? Now if it was a bipartisain group doing the study then i think the paper would be a lot easier to swallow. It would be like PETA (or insert any animal rights type of group) releasing a study saying the complete opposite from the "data" their scientists gathered. Don't you think the cattle union would be losing a large sum of money if the study didn't show that? So of course the outcome of the study would fall in their favor.
This isn't an argument - just some food for thought.
