Quote:
Originally posted by Gemini
Odds are you'd be mssging more kids, people with no cc or religious (or otherwise offended with adult content) than actual people who might be interested, let alone actually sign up. 90 - 10% if you are lucky.
And it will come down to who they prosecute for this when they get around to making the laws... you might get away with the mssg so they will simply go for the site owners. lol Our stae has already mentioned retroactive laws. Wonder how many others are doing the same? It will be "I fought the law and the law won"
Its like the jerk spammers... if you block one of their addresses, they send from another... Uh, Hel-LO... we blocked you because we are NOT interested... another address won't entice us further.
These guys are even worse than spammers. At least with spammers, we can and do turn them over to the authorities when the circumstances call for it. In this case, we'd have to be running a script just to catch the incoming and locate them.
Hey RA... I have some drano going to waste.. want a cocktail? 
So yeah, by ALL means, lets P*ss off even MORE people and give them ammo (with just cause in this case) to shut us all down.
|
Well if you've ever seen these popups there small text size and inability to have hyperlinks in the messages make them pretty crappy. I'm very surprised there is such a strong response that people apparently find the URL in the small text, copy and paste it into there browser. I think if your going to spam on these things have a VERY SHORT and easy to remember domain name.
I don't see kids being as affected by this as email spam, opening up your email innocently then finding a interracial gangbang full page ad is worse than a text only popup that you can easily close.
Not saying its good or anything, just saying its not as bad as email spam.
Sammy