Quote:
Originally Posted by mikesouth
Look I think we can all see through the bullshit here...even FTP.
The bottom line is that this seminar is an attempt to lead us to slaughter at the appearance of giving us something useful. We all know the kind of person Stuart Lawley is and we all know that this seminar will have no effect on what ICM Registry intends to do.
If they wont answert questions like who supports this then I just don't see the point. I'm like DWB I'm not going to do business with anyone who supports or benefits from this TLD period so I want to know who those people are.
Lets take ASACP we already know that they will benefit and as such have declared "neutrality" on the issue. Well if ASACP sends that money back and tells Stuart Lawley to stick it up his ass, set fire to it and die then I will support ASACP If they take the money then as far as I am concerned I hope they choke on it.
Hey I encourage y'all to attend and I encourage you to hold feet to the fire but know that you aren't going to come out with anything that benefits you. This whole thing is just another step in the stroke job to make .XXX look more palatable.
Drafting FTP as a mod was brilliant, it gives the appearance of neutrality but the truth is FTP is purely symbolic there, not he nor you is going to influence anything, the outcome has already been determined you are simply there to listen to it.
|
Well said Mike!
FTP - You were obviously asked to moderate the .xxx forum because of your long term stance AGAINST .xxx and clearly most webmasters support you in being AGAINST .xxx If now you are not prepared to ask the right questions -regardless of how tough they are - you are no longer representing what the vast majority of adult webmasters really want.
Everyone here can see it by simply reading your posts, so why not just be honest? Why the change in game plan?