Quote:
Originally Posted by twisted Illustration
The phrase you've used is quite misleading ...
Photoshop is an application for creating art. I suspect you find that Luka uses Photoshop as one of his main applications. As do I for web work and toon line and color.
What you're saying is that Luka's work is simple and clean corporate style, and the other one is a cartoony style.
Very different, but neither is 'better' than the other because of the style. Quality and style are not exclusive of each other. A high quality toon logo is worth the same as a high quality clean corporate logo.
I'm not judging the work in the thread at all. Just making distictions between the styles etc.
|
Lol. You know just as well as I do what I ment. But not everyone is a designer and know the difference between vector graphics and something that's just a .PSD, hence the 'photoshop logo'. If your superior knowledge of photoshop and the terminology makes you feel better, knock yourself out.
Also, nowhere did I say that either was better.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gabrielapensa
Yes, I do see how it does not look like one of our best works. We will gladly work with you again on it, if you need at no extra charge. I'm unsure as to how that one didn't come out so good and I apologize
|
No, no. It's all good. When Luka did the logo he was in the middle of something (with you?), a big move or something. When I said then that I didn't like it, he just said he didn't have time to redo it. At the time I was pretty pissed off about it, but that's all in the past and doesn't change that the (other) logos are damn fine. I just wrote the expenses off, so no hard feelings at all. You can't win them all.
I turned to Dickmans design which was a good choice, and I don't need to have you redo anything for me. My post came out a bit harsh, and that wasn't my intention. Sorry.
