01-29-2007, 07:28 PM
|
|
|
Doin fine
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 24,984
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tony404
Dont have to its your ass not mine,if your going to have a hardon attitude with models you have to be ready. Your business doesnt affect mine one way or another but to think its impossible that you can get busted is beyond dumb.You dont live in a porn friendly place and remember "its not fair doesn't work" in a court of law. Here is what your state gov is working on:
http://www.rctimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll.../1007/MTCN0305 |
Ok now what does a law that will never get passed and being pushed with a democrat, and has to do with late night tv infomercials have to do with me? The one you were referring to had to do with a couple in Cali that were selling beastiality, incest, and piss scenes. They got busted for selling to a postal inspector. This was in 1996. I dont shoot ANYTHING close to that, and we do mostly nude teasy type stuff and light masturbation, maybe hj, and bj stuff. I dont even put most of it up for download. It is mailed fedex to our clients. Now find me the law concerning PRODUCTION of content in the state of TN.
Quote:
For example, a husband and wife operating a Bulletin Board System (BBS) from their house in Milpitas, California, were prosecuted and convicted in Tennessee for displaying obscene content. The BBS provided, among other things, access to GIF scans for a membership fee. A U.S. Postal Inspector purchased a membership from Memphis, Tennessee. The husband called the Inspector in Memphis and gave him an access code.
The Inspector brought six counts against the couple under 18 U.S.C. § 1465 for using a means of interstate commerce (a combined computer and telephone system) for the purpose of transporting obscene images, namely GIF files containing images of "bestiality, oral sex, incest, sado-masochistic abuse, and sex scenes involving urination." The couple was convicted on all six counts, and a few others including mailing a sexually explicit video to Tennessee. Their computer system was "forfeited" (the government took their property by force without compensation - see 18 U.S.C. § 1467), the husband was sentenced to 37 months in prison, and the wife was sentenced to 30 months. The Appeals Court upheld their convictions, and the Supreme Court refused to hear the case. See United States v. Thomas, 74 F.3d 701 (6th Cir.), Cert. denied, 117 S.Ct. 74 (1996).
|
|
|
|