Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
you are lucky my autistic friend, you caught me at a time when i am bored and tired of working.
let me help you with your very flawed understanding of things
1) he definately had all kinds of biological and chemical weapons
|
Check.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
2) he definately used them many years ago against Kurds and Iran
|
Check.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
3) most of what he had was accounted for and destroyed through the UN program
4) the only arguments that existed after that were about what wasn't accounted for BUT was never proven to even exist and not thought to exist by weapons inspectors or Hans Blix
|
Yes. This would explain why the weapons inspectors were jerked around so much. Oh, wait it doesn't.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
5) the argument was made that he has a large variety of weapons, that he is going to deploy them at any moment, that he is an "imminent threat" and since he won't cooperate, he must be attacked
|
That is usually the case with any weapon. There is usually a way to deploy them
You got one thing right. He wasn't cooperating.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
6) Powell went to the UN and gave the most dissapointing presentation possibly immaginable that set back educated black people about 50 years. this presentation was very specific about weapons that did exist, about mobile labs, their locations, their state of readiness and so on... with the punchline being "he is gonna use them at any second, so we have to attack him"
|
Like you known any different at that time. It's easy to play Monday morning quarterback.
Every government intelligence agency agreed with that. Prehaps they should of just asked you?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
7) the UN did not agree with this approach or that there was sufficient evidence of the existence of the alleged "WMDs"
|
The UN wanted to dick around with weapon inspectors some more. Probably to milked out food for oil awhile longer.
Their intelligence says one thing they base their actions on something else.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
8) NATO did not agree with this approach or that there was sufficient evidence of the existence of the alleged "WMDs"
|
The US already had the support of any NATO country worth a fuck.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
9) Iraq was invaded for the stated purpose of "disarming" him of these weapons
10) so far, nothing has been found
|
Either has Bin Laden prehaps he doesn't exist either..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
11) you will read this, give it due thought, still be autistic and mentally impaired, not "get it" and keep making retarded remarks that are off topic and make no sense to defend what most in the world agree is 100% indefensible.
|
I can always spot a punk. You have no problem speaking that way over the internet but you would probably be the last one to speak that way in somebody's face.