|
Webby, you are correct. HOWEVER, neteller was the transaction method for the money for gambling to move from the US to the casinos in question. Therefore, they were part of a business transaction that happened in the US, and therefore are bound by US law for those transactions.
If neteller had not accepted money for gambling from US customers, they would not have an issue, because moving money from the UK to an offshore casino, example, isn't subject to US law. They are only in trouble for the transactions that started in the US.
|