Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
everyone responds with remarks like this as if the defense does not have the full and complete opportunity to educate the jury.
juries aren't typically experts on armed robbery, murder, arson and rape either.. yet the system seems to work pretty well for the accused.
|
Again you are comparing things that anyone can understand to something that if you persoanlly did not have experience with it you wont believe it.
For example since the start of time people have been murdered and robbed etc would a jury believe a story such as ?the gun just went off by me simply touching the hostler?
Try explaining your dad or someone who has personally never experienced things just popping up on their computer without doing anything, noone would believe you.
I don?t know her I didn?t study the case and I wasn?t present at the trial and neither where you, my point is there is a very very good chance that it was spyware, heck what if the janitor used that computer the night before to surf, so many ways shit could of happened.
If even one person on the jury would of experienced spyware she would not of been convicted.
Now maybe there is more to it, maybe she was sitting there talking about the porn to the kids, im talking based on the story in the papers.