Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyDanza
are you serious..... have you seen every ggw out there... cause I am watching one now where the girl is in the hallway of a hotel and the security gaurd is there and guess what hes doing bending her over and fucking her... are you claiming that my eyes are bad? 20/10 here baby I know what I see... so lets see here... your saying she was 17 thast ok? are an idiot as an owner of a company you have to look our for the best intrest of the company... saying she's 17 not 10 may be the dumbest statement I have heard all night...laws are laws... and yeah you can film who ever you want on public places but not kids... notice how they always block kids faces... any time the news is on here in nevada and there talking aobut kids say in court or whatever... they are not allowed to show the face because they are minor... so maybe check on your facts before you start preaching... keep in mind I have been shooting content for over 6 years and I tend to push the line alot with my content... so I get a lot of heat for it.. therefore my company is fully up top date on all laws when it comes to filming anywhere... ok my business license is a motion picture / tv/ audio production company I can film anywhere in vegas... we are insured for 2 mil with a 5 mil umbrella... anytime I film anything anything at all thats not porn related even example was the tony hawk huck jam or what ever it's called... when I put into the county to go film it first question on the pamplet I had to fill out was... do you plan on filming any minors if so you need a gaurdian to sign right... just like if a 17 year old girl goes to the doctor before they do anything the parents have to sign.. theres a reason she's a minor and if she mis respresented her age thast still joe's fault... just like if I shot a girl that was underage and she lied to me I would still have to take blame for it.... if I recall they had to recall all traci lords videos right?
|
Yeah, laws are laws... that's why I added the IMO.
Which GGW title are you refering too? Back in 2002 when the incident they were in court over took place they had nothing other than flashing and softcore girl/girl scenes. I know they have a couple new ones out, maybe they're more hardcore.
On another note,
They only have to block kids faces if it's over something being investigated (because of the young offenders act) or if the sitatuation being reported would put the minor in harms way. If you're filming a swimming competition, news interview, disneyland commercial, mardi gras, whatever... you don't have to censor anything or get ID's from anyone. If you did mothers would be arrested every time they filmed their kids at the park or at the beach and school photographers would be hauled downtown every time a class photo is taken. Wouldn't make any sense.
And 2257 record keeping would not apply to the vast majority of the old GGW 'flashing' type content because it is not sexually explicit as defined in USC110S2256. But you make it sound like they purposely went around looking for minors when that's far from the truth.
ps. ya, im pretty sure they recalled the traci lords video(s) in question... GGW also removed a large number of their dvd titles because of this incident as well.