Quote:
Originally Posted by Splum
Ok smarty pants where did the cells come from that started our life? Beyond that where did the material come from before the big bang?
|
Yes, yes, yes. Since the evol scientististsorx cant explain everything, they must obviously be wrong. Especially when there is something they say they cant explain, which they actually cant explain! Oh my God.
And the worst part is that if you had bothered reading up on evolution, you would have better questions.
Such as, what was it that caused the mutation that later evolved into the eye?
That very question, the eye-one, was one Darwin himself put in his works. It carries symbolic meaning to "the evool scientists", and is a great example of the "faith" of the evolution-ists.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splum
Get a grip its obvious there is something out there larger, greater and way beyond our comprehension so why dont you practice a little faith.
|
Because I have no valid proof of faith solving anything. I try to solve problems by thinking, not by begging an imaginary being that has shown no sign of its authenticity, even when it was what i specifically begged for.
Do you know what I think is obvious? That its a much more impending mystery to see why people select the option with least credibility, religion.
Science cant explain everything (yet?), but it can explain a whole lot and prove it as well.
Religion cant explain EVERYTHING (look, God made a deer), and can prove NONE of it.
I guess the cut is between people who value proof higher than explanation. Or the between the people who value proof and the people that dont.
But most of all, i want to know why you are trying to prove an imaginary being logically?
AN IMAGINARY BEING IS NOT LOGICAL. TRYING TO PROVE SOMETHING WHICH HAS BEEN SHOT DOWN TONS OF TIMES WITH THE SAME FUCKING ARGUMENT IS NOT LOGICAL. BY ALL ACCOUNTS, "GOD WANTS IT" IS STILL YOUR MOST LOGICAL AND BEST ARGUMENT.
I put it in all caps for easier understanding.