Quote:
Originally Posted by DrinkingHARDEST
You would have to be doing something seriously fraudulent for Epass to do something like this. Don't get your tighty whiteys in a bind people ;)
DH
|
in theory or they could just start tking people's money..
Everyone said and says the same thing about paypal, yet there are people like me who just got plain robbed by them..
If they didnt have that in their terms and someone cimmited "fraud" they wouldnt get to keepthe money anyways so why add this ?
Banks dont have this clause, credit card companies dont have an open ended clause like this so why have it..
Obvioulsy they didnt just add this clause to rip people off. i will explain in short why they did it ( imo). If someone has 5000 in their account and they commit a $200 fraud of some sort that leaves 4800 that epass cant spend and the account holder cant spend = $4800 in limbo.. additionally , iin investigating the fraud epassporte incurs charges ( time/manpower ) its only fair they are compensated for their time..
the problem is it would have been easy to write in a clause outlining these costs/procedures.. the way they have it now they can close your account because you have brown hair.. and take all your money , and you have no legal recourse