http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070106/...et_pornography
Some of the wording really concerns me..
"If approved, ICM would be required to help develop mechanisms for promoting child safety and preventing child pornography, "including practices that appeal to pedophiles or suggest the presence of child pornography on the site."
i wonder what they mean by "practises that appeal to pedophiles" ?
and
"suggests the presence of cp"
Sounds suspiciously like they weant to censor words..
seems like all our complaints were of no use either..
"But ICANN officials said they initially rejected the proposal in May
not because of the opposition "