Quote:
Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat
I will definitely write to ICANN again or post those comments but perhaps someone could summarize what exact changes their new proposed agreement contains....
I mean, regardless what changes there are - we should oppose it again - but it wouldn' harm to know what exactly the ICM guys changed in their new proposal
|
Like i wrote in first post above, their changes were to appease various country members.. example like muslim.xxx would never be allowed to be registered (not confirmed, but thats one potential appeasement)
Their new proposal is more technical in nature, because they can shown ICANN many years ago, they they had "community" support, so it was forward movement to the details of how the registry would be runned.
What all webmasters need to challenge is the root of this, that the adult online entertainment industry does not support it. Some may have done so back in 2000, but fast forward 6 years, and 2257 issues, and its a different world.
Fight the apathy!