View Single Post
Old 12-18-2006, 12:27 PM  
MarkTiarra
Confirmed User
 
MarkTiarra's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,833
A god part of this is the way they run the UFC too though. They stand guys up much more quickly than they do in say Pride and the cage as opposed to ropes allows strikers to force a good grappler into a spot where he can't work. The standing them up thing is a huge difference though. I understand the need to keep it exciting and not have a fight where there is a stalemate on the ground but they stand guys up way more often than they need to in my opinion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevsh View Post
A few years ago, okay even last year, it seemed that the key to UFC success was the guys with strong ground skills (and in UFC histroy, Gracie, Shamrock, Hughes, etc. they owned)

Lately, the guys who are devastating on their feet *and* can avoid takedowns are taking over:

Chuck Lidell - Definetly a striker and has beaten guys like Ortiz and Couture who had far better grappling skills

Georges St. Pierre - Owned Matt Hughes with his stand-up, though he's got a ground game too. Maybe the best overall fighter in UFC now mainly due to his incredible striking.

Tim Sylvia - Definetly a striker but managed to avoid takedowns vs. one of the world's best, Jeff Monson

Anderson Silva - Destroyed Rich Franklin with his stand-up

Okay, the only other champ, Sherk, is a ground guy but clearly the advantage seems to be heavily in favour of the guys who win with their fists and kicks ... and if the past few events are any indication, it is bringing out far more exciting bouts.

Discuss while I eat breakfast.
__________________

Retired Pornosticator
MarkTiarra is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote