|
i would look at it like this - compare it to FCC Rules about what can be said on the radio. If everyone can agree that you don't want your kids hearing "cunt" on the radio... then at what point do you draw the line when new words that mean "cunt" comes into use, becomes popular, is ultimately considered just as offensive as cunt, which then again is understood by children and something a parent doesn't want their kids to hear? this is basically what the last FCC laws (after the Janet Jackson fiasco) addressed in its very vague language and extreme penalties. when you push and push, you can reasonably expect people to start taking action, changing laws, creating new laws and increasing fines and penalties. a reasonable person should expect that continuing to push that boundary would put them in the direct line of fire.
when you push the boundaries, you can always expect people and the law to push back. in the case of pornography, pushing the boundaries also means putting your freedom, your family and property at risk and going head to head with a federal government that has made it more than clear on many occassions that they don't like you and are coming after you.
at the end of the day, you have to understand and accept the risks and make those decisions FOR YOURSELF and live with the consequences... or avoid them completely. if you start pushing the boundaries and drawing the worst kind of attention possible.. dont ever tell me "hey, i'm a pornographer just like you" as a defense. i didn't agree that you could test the boundaries, attract the worst possible attention in my name and make decisions that could turn my world upside down, although i understand it can happen.
people like to discuss "right" and "wrong"... morals and ethics, create excuses and play semantics... but don't like to discuss personal accountability for the risks they chose to assume.
|