Quote:
Originally Posted by After Shock Media
I know they are cautious as hell when it comes to protecting their own ass.
Though I refuse to commend any company that feels it is being "proactive" by discrimination. The girls would be of legal age to work, yet are being prevented from working because their body does not look mature enough. This of course is in addition to their strong rules that prevent performers from acting young, using the word teen without 18 or 19 attached, and so forth. Punishment purely on the shape of a girls body. So yes they should be sued.
|
they are not preventing the girl from working. She can go work for cams.com or any other cam site or she can go work at mcdonalds.
They also do not allow affiliates to use the word "teen" without 18 or 19 attached, all the same rules apply for us as well. I think this is great. Nice to see a company set a HIGH standard instead of trying to make an 18 year old girl look like a 12 year old like most companies do.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by After Shock Media
I do not care how ifriends is different that other webcam companies. For some time ifriends had some sort of electronic device that law enforcement officials was supposed to request from ifriends. This device would allow law enforcement to check each photo etc. This was to go into effect with the updated 2257 laws. No idea if they kept this..
|
right you don't know. so what if they have this device or not. It is more then what other cam sites have regardless if it is the end all soultion or not. ALL CAM SITES have the same problems of 2257 that you mention. It's not just ifriends.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by After Shock Media
Regardless they encourage the performers to make as much content as possible. Often their cameras took pictures automatically via grabs on ifriends end (this may have been disabled now). They also encourage them to make personal sites, fan clubs, promotional material, promotional sites, and of course they automatically become clickcash affiliates. Yet they keep most performers in the dark about 2257 laws and just saw "we take care of it". Despite the fact that the performers are primary producers as well as secondary producers (sometimes).
|
WOW they encourage their cam host to make webpages and to advertise themselves. I have never seen that before from another cam company. I know you don't like them but I don't understand why you are just pointing them out. Everything you mentioned (except for the too young rule) is something that applies to all cam companies.